The support outsourcing
RFP kit
Most support RFPs are built from a feature list, and feature lists do not predict how a support operation actually performs eighteen months in. This is the question set that does, with the reason each question matters and what a weak answer sounds like.
71 questions across eight areas, a scoring sheet, and the answers that should worry you. Written by a vendor, which is worth knowing, so it includes the section most vendors leave out: the questions we find hard to answer ourselves.

Why most RFPs fail to predict anything
A support RFP usually asks what channels a vendor covers, which helpdesk tools they know, how many seats they can staff and what the hourly rate is. Every serious vendor answers all four the same way, because all four are table stakes. The document sorts nobody.
What actually varies between vendors, and what determines whether the engagement works, is harder to ask about: who the agents report to, how long they stay, what happens when the answer to a ticket does not exist yet, and what it costs you to leave.
The published data makes the case for asking better questions.
The eight questions that decide it
If you only ask eight, ask these. Everything in the full bank is an elaboration of one of them.
The full question bank
Sixty-three questions across eight areas, after the eight above. Send the whole thing or cut it to the sections you care about. The why it matters line under each one is there so whoever reads the responses knows what a good answer looks like.
1 · The people
2 · Coverage and continuity
3 · Tools and integration
4 · Quality and measurement
5 · Security and compliance
6 · Commercials and exit
7 · Onboarding and the first ninety days
8 · The ones that are easy to forget
Plus the section most vendors leave out: the five questions we find hard to answer about ourselves, answered.
One email. No sequence, no call unless you ask for one.
Scoring the answers
Scoring an RFP on a 1 to 5 scale across seventy-one questions produces a number nobody trusts. This is coarser and more useful: three buckets, and one rule.
| Bucket | What it means | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Answered | A specific, checkable answer. A number, a name, a date, a document. | Score it. This is the only bucket that counts. |
| Described | A process explained without a figure attached. “We have a rigorous QA program.” | Ask once more for the number. If it does not come, treat it as Not answered. |
| Not answered | Deflected, reframed, or answered with a different question’s answer. | Count these. The count is more predictive than any score. |
| The eight that decide it | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Who do the agents report to, and who writes their review? | |||
| 02Agent attrition on accounts our size, last 12 months? | |||
| 03First contact resolution on ticketing, and how is it calculated? | |||
| 04Who are the named individuals, and can we interview them? | |||
| 05Week one: a ticket needs an answer nobody has written down. Then what? | |||
| 06Signature to answering real tickets, and what do you need from us? | |||
| 07What does the exit look like? | |||
| 08What would make you tell us we are not a good fit? | |||
| Miss score, out of 8 · a vague answer counts half |
–
mark the answers above
|
–
mark the answers above
|
–
mark the answers above
|
✓ a specific checkable answer ·
~ a process described with no figure ·
✕ deflected or not answered
count of questions each vendor did not answer, because that count predicts far more than any weighted total.
Nothing is sent anywhere and nothing is stored.
Weighting, if you must
If you need a weighted score for a procurement process, weight by how expensive the mistake is to correct later. Staffing and exit terms are close to impossible to fix mid-contract. Tooling and reporting are fixable in a quarter.
| Area | Suggested weight | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The people | 30% | Cannot be fixed after signature without starting again |
| Commercials and exit | 20% | Fixed at signature, renegotiated only from a weak position |
| Quality and measurement | 15% | Changeable, but only if the vendor already measures |
| Security and compliance | 15% | Usually pass or fail rather than scored |
| Coverage and continuity | 10% | Negotiable during the term |
| Onboarding | 5% | Painful once, then over |
| Tools and integration | 5% | The easiest thing on this list to change |
Answers that should worry you
Not lies. Ordinary, reasonable-sounding answers that reliably predict a problem.
| What you hear | What it usually means |
|---|---|
| “Our CSAT is 95%.” | A chat number, or a blended one. The median company scores 95.15% on conversational channels and 88.00% on ticketing. Ask which this is. |
| “We can staff that in two weeks.” with no questions asked first | They have not understood the product yet. A vendor that quotes a timeline before asking what the tickets are about is quoting a seat, not a team. |
| “Our AI deflects 60% of tickets.” | Deflection is not resolution. A deflected ticket can be a customer who gave up. Ask what happened to the deflected 60% and how many came back. |
| “We work with companies of all sizes.” | No model. Every real delivery model fits a band and breaks outside it. |
| “Attrition is in line with industry average.” | A refusal with a sentence around it. Ask for the number for accounts your size. |
| “We will assign your team at go-live.” | You are buying capacity. Legitimate, but price it as capacity. |
| “That is covered in the MSA.” | It may well be. Ask them to read you the clause. |
| Any answer to ‘what would make us a bad fit’ that is actually a pitch | The clearest signal in the whole process. |
The questions we find hard
This document was written by Touch Support, which is a company you might be putting through this process. Leaving out the questions that are awkward for us would make the rest of it worth less, so here they are, with our answers.
Common questions about running the process
How many vendors should we put through this?
Should we send all seventy-one questions?
Is an RFP even the right format?
What should we ask references?
How long should this take?
Where the figures come from
Every figure on this page is from a published source with its sample size and data year stated. Freshworks Customer Service Benchmark Report 2025, 32,000+ companies and 1.2 billion tickets, 2024 data. Gartner, 321 customer service leaders, fielded October 2025. ACSI National Index Q1 2026, approximately 200,000 annual interviews. SQM Group, 500+ North American contact centers. The full set of 28 sources, with links, is in our benchmark report.
We will read another vendor’s responses with you and tell you what we would ask next. No charge, and no obligation to include us in the process.
